In May 2016, Li and Chen, who were neighbors, had a dispute over the source of goods, and both sides were beaten and damaged.
The two sides could not reach an agreement because of compensation. Li Mou appealed to the court and asked Chen to compensate for medical expenses, lost time, disability compensation, etc. In the trial, Chen filed a counterclaim.
After the trial, the court ruled that Chen compensated Li for all losses of more than 50,000 yuan, and Li should compensate Chen for all losses of more than 80,000 yuan. After the judgment came into effect, neither party fulfilled its compensation obligations.
In July 2019, Li Mou and Chen successively applied to the court for enforcement.
During the execution, the court mailed the legal documents such as the execution notice and the report property order to the two parties, and mediate the two parties.
At the same time, the court investigated and controlled the property of both parties according to law, and found that both banks have large deposits for execution.
In order to resolve the contradictions between the two parties, the judge did not directly deduct the money from both parties, but tried to use mediation to encourage the two parties to take the initiative to withdraw compensation.
After summoning, the two sides came to the court on July 4. In the mediation, the two sides have great contradictions and refused to perform their compensation obligations.
The executive judge started from the facts of the case, elaborated on the facts of the case, the basis of the judgment, etc. and dispelled the doubts about the unfair judgment.
The executive judge also patiently communicated with the two parties and informed him of the legal consequences of the property’s refusal to perform the legal instrument in force.
From the perspective of reason, the executive judge explained to the two sides that they should be justified in competition, make money, and jointly maintain good neighbor relationships.
After the implementation of mediation, the two sides regretted the mutual deeds and expressed their willingness to pay the compensation. The case was successfully executed.Huoshan County People's Courtxx